Screener
AADR vs SPDF
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright ADR ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.40% less per year.
- AADR is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AADR covers global markets; SPDF covers north america.
- AADR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AADR | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.09% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $5M |
| Since | 2010 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.48% | — |
| Max drawdown | -45.01% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AADR and SPDF
Explore further