Screener
AAPR vs DGRO
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to April 2026 vs iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- DGRO costs 0.71% less per year.
- DGRO is significantly larger than AAPR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAPR is classified as alternative, while DGRO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- AAPR follows a structured outcome strategy; DGRO uses index tracking.
- DGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAPR | DGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $52M | $39.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.0% | +24.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.44% | 9.59% |
| Max drawdown | -5.99% | -35.10% |
Similar to AAPR and DGRO
Explore further