Screener
AAVM vs DFAW
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Dimensional World Equity ETF
Key differences
- DFAW costs 0.14% less per year.
- DFAW is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; DFAW uses index tracking.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | DFAW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 1.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +30.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 12.13% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -16.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and DFAW
Explore further