Screener
AAVM vs EZRO
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Alphadroid Defensive Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 0.63% less per year.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; EZRO uses index tracking.
- AAVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | EZRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $34M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -11.57% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and EZRO
Explore further