Screener
AAVM vs FDMO
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
Key differences
- FDMO costs 0.23% less per year.
- FDMO is significantly larger than AAVM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAVM follows a active selection strategy; FDMO uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FDMO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | FDMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $842M |
| Since | 2017 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | +16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 16.48% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -33.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and FDMO
Explore further