Screener
AAVM vs RULE
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF vs Adaptive Core ETF
Key differences
- AAVM costs 1.46% less per year.
- AAVM is classified as equity, while RULE is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, AAVM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAVM | RULE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 1.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24M | $14M |
| Since | 2017 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +41.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.23% | 19.69% |
| Max drawdown | -34.71% | -30.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAVM and RULE
Explore further