Screener
ABEQ vs KAT
Absolute Select Value ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- KAT costs 0.10% less per year.
- KAT is significantly larger than ABEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABEQ | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $688M |
| Since | 2020 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.19% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.93% | — |
| Max drawdown | -27.82% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABEQ and KAT
Explore further