Screener
ABFL vs ABLS
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF
Key differences
- ABLS costs 0.10% less per year.
- ABFL is significantly larger than ABLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABFL follows a active selection strategy; ABLS uses index tracking.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABFL | ABLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $498M | $1M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 12.26% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.2% | +0.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.34% | 17.44% |
| Max drawdown | -34.95% | -19.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABFL and ABLS
Explore further