Screener
ABFL vs SQLT
Abacus FCF Leaders ETF vs Ishares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
Both ABFL and SQLT are equity ETFs. ABFL charges 0.49% a year and SQLT 0.20%. The main difference: ABFL follows a active selection strategy; SQLT uses index tracking.
- ABFL follows a active selection strategy; SQLT uses index tracking.
- SQLT costs 0.29% less per year.
- ABFL is much larger than SQLT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABFL | SQLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $520M | $8M |
| Since | 2016 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.54% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.63% | — |
| Max drawdown | -34.95% | -3.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.