Screener
ABLG vs ABOT
Abacus FCF ETF Trust - Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF vs Abacus FCF ETF Trust - Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF
Key differences
- ABLG follows a active selection strategy; ABOT uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ABOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABLG | ABOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | — |
| Since | — | — |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.5% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.7% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.2% | +9.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.95% | 16.81% |
| Max drawdown | -34.17% | -29.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABLG and ABOT
Explore further