Screener
ABLS vs ABFL
Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF vs Abacus FCF Leaders ETF
Key differences
- ABLS costs 0.10% less per year.
- ABFL is significantly larger than ABLS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ABLS follows a index tracking strategy; ABFL uses active selection.
- ABFL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ABLS | ABFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1M | $498M |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 12.26% | 0.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.4% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.44% | 15.34% |
| Max drawdown | -19.29% | -34.95% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ABLS and ABFL
Explore further