Screener
ACES vs RFFC
ALPS Clean Energy ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.07% less per year.
- ACES is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACES follows a index tracking strategy; RFFC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACES | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $127M | $29M |
| Since | 2018 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.64% | 0.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.8% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.1% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -8.4% | +12.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.00 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 32.30% | 12.11% |
| Max drawdown | -79.05% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACES and RFFC
Explore further