Screener
ACGR vs FNDX
American Century ETF Trust - American Century Large Cap Growth ETF vs Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Key differences
- ACGR follows a active selection strategy; FNDX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, ACGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACGR | FNDX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $25.9B |
| Since | — | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +33.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +15.2% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.56% | 10.39% |
| Max drawdown | -34.54% | -37.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACGR and FNDX
Explore further