Skip to content
Screener

ACIO vs APMU

Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

ACIO

Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$2.4B

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$232M

Key differences

ACIO is an alternative ETF, while APMU is a fixed income ETF. ACIO charges 0.79% a year and APMU 0.35%.

  • ACIO is an alternative fund, while APMU is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • ACIO follows a option income strategy; APMU uses active selection.
  • APMU costs 0.44% less per year.
  • ACIO is much larger than APMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ACIO has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

ACIOAPMU
Annual cost (TER)0.79%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$2.4B$232M
Since20192023
Dividend yield0.38%2.65%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+13.9%+4.1%
CAGR 3Y+15.6%+3.0%
CAGR 5Y+10.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.13-0.22
Volatility 1Y8.63%2.40%
Max drawdown-14.19%-4.39%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to ACIO and APMU