Screener
ACIO vs JANB
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs Aptus January Buffer ETF
Key differences
- JANB costs 0.54% less per year.
- ACIO is significantly larger than JANB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACIO is classified as equity, while JANB is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ACIO follows a active selection strategy; JANB uses structured outcome.
- ACIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACIO | JANB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $59M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.40% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.19% | -6.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACIO and JANB
Explore further