Screener
ACLC vs UMAR
American Century ETF Trust - American Century Large Cap Equity ETF vs Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March
Key differences
- ACLC is classified as equity, while UMAR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ACLC follows a active selection strategy; UMAR uses structured outcome.
- Over the last 3 years, ACLC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACLC | UMAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $211M |
| Since | — | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.8% | +15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.3% | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.94 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.44% | 5.02% |
| Max drawdown | -26.44% | -11.08% |
Similar to ACLC and UMAR
Explore further