Screener
ACLO vs IGCB
Tcw Aaa Clo Etf vs TCW Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ACLO costs 0.15% less per year.
- ACLO is significantly larger than IGCB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACLO follows a active selection strategy; IGCB uses index tracking.
- IGCB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACLO | IGCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $497M | $39M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 4.84% | 4.67% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.4% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.76% | 4.02% |
| Max drawdown | -1.42% | -4.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACLO and IGCB
Explore further