Screener
ACSG vs BUSA
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs Brandes U.S. Value ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.11% less per year.
- BUSA is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | BUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $292M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 11.96% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -14.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and BUSA
Explore further