Screener
ACSG vs FYC
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs First Trust Small Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.21% less per year.
- FYC is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACSG follows a active selection strategy; FYC uses index tracking.
- FYC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | FYC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.07% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +56.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.07% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -47.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and FYC
Explore further