Screener
ACSG vs TMFS
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- ACSG costs 0.36% less per year.
- TMFS is significantly larger than ACSG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACSG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $64M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -13.28% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACSG and TMFS
Explore further