Screener
ACTS vs FFEM
FIS Tactical Equity ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Emerging M
Key differences
- ACTS follows a active selection strategy; FFEM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACTS | FFEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $39M |
| Since | — | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +57.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.16% |
| Max drawdown | -8.03% | -16.29% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACTS and FFEM
Explore further