Screener
ACVF vs FDRS
American Conservative Values ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- ACVF is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ACVF follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- ACVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVF | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $146M | $77M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.39% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACVF and FDRS
Explore further