Screener
ACVF vs TACU
American Conservative Values ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- TACU costs 0.75% less per year.
- ACVF is significantly larger than TACU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACVF follows a active selection strategy; TACU uses index tracking.
- ACVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVF | TACU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $146M | $14M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.39% | -8.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACVF and TACU
Explore further