Screener
ACVF vs VTHR
American Conservative Values ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTHR costs 0.69% less per year.
- VTHR is significantly larger than ACVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACVF follows a active selection strategy; VTHR uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, VTHR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- VTHR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVF | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $146M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.8% | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.3% | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.46% | 12.43% |
| Max drawdown | -24.39% | -34.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACVF and VTHR
Explore further