Screener
ACVT vs SPIB
Advent Convertible Bond ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Intermediate Term Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
Both ACVT and SPIB are fixed income ETFs. ACVT charges 0.65% a year and SPIB 0.04%. The main difference: ACVT follows a active selection strategy; SPIB uses index tracking.
- ACVT follows a active selection strategy; SPIB uses index tracking.
- SPIB costs 0.61% less per year.
- SPIB is much larger than ACVT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- SPIB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVT | SPIB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $11.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 4.43% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.9% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.55 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.68% | 2.82% |
| Max drawdown | -4.81% | -14.94% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.