Screener
ACVU vs HQGO
Hartford Alpha Capture Value ETF vs Hartford US Quality Growth ETF
Key differences
- ACVU follows a active selection strategy; HQGO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACVU | HQGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $51M |
| Since | — | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.1% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.07% | 13.67% |
| Max drawdown | -13.11% | -20.85% |
Similar to ACVU and HQGO
Explore further