Screener
ACWI vs IJH
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 0.27% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than ACWI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ACWI covers global markets; IJH covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, ACWI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWI | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31.3B | $115.7B |
| Since | 2008 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.0% | +26.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +8.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.18 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.88% | 15.73% |
| Max drawdown | -33.53% | -42.18% |
Similar to ACWI and IJH
Explore further