Screener
ACWI vs URTH
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.08% less per year.
- ACWI is significantly larger than URTH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWI | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31.3B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2008 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.45% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.5% | +12.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -33.53% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWI and URTH
Explore further