Screener
ACWX vs CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF vs iShares Low Carbon Optimized MSCI ACWI ETF
Key differences
- CRBN costs 0.12% less per year.
- ACWX is significantly larger than CRBN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CRBN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ACWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ACWX | CRBN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.1B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.58% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global ex us | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.3% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.7% | +11.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.42% | 13.09% |
| Max drawdown | -35.35% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ACWX and CRBN
Explore further