Screener
ADPV vs AMAX
Adaptiv Select ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- ADPV costs 0.36% less per year.
- ADPV is classified as equity, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ADPV follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADPV | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $171M | $60M |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.2% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.7% | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.05% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -22.30% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADPV and AMAX
Explore further