Screener
ADPV vs CCOR
Adaptiv Select ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- ADPV costs 0.29% less per year.
- ADPV is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADPV is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ADPV follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, ADPV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADPV | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.00% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $171M | $28M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.68% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.2% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.7% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.05% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -22.30% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADPV and CCOR
Explore further