Screener
AFK vs EZA
VanEck Africa Index ETF vs iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
Key differences
Both AFK and EZA are equity ETFs. AFK charges 0.76% a year and EZA 0.59%. The main difference: EZA costs 0.17% less per year.
- EZA costs 0.17% less per year.
- EZA is much larger than AFK. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFK | EZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.76% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $693M |
| Since | 2008 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 0.98% | 6.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.6% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.2% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.3% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.09% | 31.44% |
| Max drawdown | -53.33% | -62.25% |
Similar to AFK and EZA
Explore further