Screener
AFOS vs ARKQ
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Key differences
- AFOS costs 0.30% less per year.
- ARKQ is significantly larger than AFOS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ARKQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFOS | ARKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $272M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +76.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +41.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 32.38% |
| Max drawdown | -11.52% | -59.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFOS and ARKQ
Explore further