Screener
AFSM vs FYX
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF vs First Trust Small Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FYX costs 0.17% less per year.
- FYX is significantly larger than AFSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFSM follows a active selection strategy; FYX uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FYX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FYX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFSM | FYX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.49% | 0.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.1% | +49.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | +21.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.6% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.93% | 18.43% |
| Max drawdown | -43.54% | -48.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFSM and FYX
Explore further