Screener
AGG vs LQDH
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGG costs 0.21% less per year.
- AGG is significantly larger than LQDH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, LQDH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGG | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.03% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $135.4B | $506M |
| Since | 2003 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 6.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +8.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.7% | +8.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.1% | +5.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.04 | 1.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.90% | 2.73% |
| Max drawdown | -18.43% | -24.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGG and LQDH
Explore further