Screener
AGGA vs CGMU
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Capital Group Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMU costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGMU is significantly larger than AGGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGGA follows a active selection strategy; CGMU uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGGA | CGMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 3.35% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +6.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.16% | 2.31% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGGA and CGMU
Explore further