Screener
AGGA vs CGUI
Astoria Dynamic Core US Fixed Income ETF vs Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF
Key differences
- CGUI costs 0.37% less per year.
- CGUI is significantly larger than AGGA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGGA follows a active selection strategy; CGUI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGGA | CGUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $76M | $246M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 3.95% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.16% | 0.74% |
| Max drawdown | -1.47% | -0.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGGA and CGUI
Explore further