Screener
AGMI vs SILJ
Themes Silver Miners ETF vs Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF
Key differences
- AGMI costs 0.34% less per year.
- SILJ is significantly larger than AGMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGMI is classified as equity, while SILJ is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AGMI follows a index tracking strategy; SILJ uses option income.
- SILJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGMI | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $3.9B |
| Since | 2024 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 4.15% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +124.3% | +132.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +46.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.00 |
| Volatility 1Y | 48.66% | 54.92% |
| Max drawdown | -33.26% | -70.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGMI and SILJ
Explore further