Screener
AGNG vs AQWA
Global X Aging Population ETF vs Global X Clean Water ETF
Key differences
- AGNG is significantly larger than AQWA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AGNG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGNG | AQWA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $26M |
| Since | 2016 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.4% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.48 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.52% | 14.38% |
| Max drawdown | -30.58% | -29.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGNG and AQWA
Explore further