Screener
AGOX vs RFFC
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF vs ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Key differences
AGOX is an alternative ETF, while RFFC is an equity ETF. AGOX charges 1.33% a year and RFFC 0.48%.
- AGOX is an alternative fund, while RFFC is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC costs 0.85% less per year.
- AGOX is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGOX | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.33% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $387M | $30M |
| Since | 2012 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.5% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.8% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.39% | 12.26% |
| Max drawdown | -27.72% | -36.26% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.