Screener
AGZ vs FALN
iShares Agency Bond ETF vs iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- FALN is significantly larger than AGZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FALN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AGZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZ | FALN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $552M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 6.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +9.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.15 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 4.58% |
| Max drawdown | -11.01% | -29.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZ and FALN
Explore further