Screener
AGZ vs HIMU
iShares Agency Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- AGZ costs 0.19% less per year.
- HIMU is significantly larger than AGZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| AGZ | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $552M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2008 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.1% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.10 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.61% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -11.01% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AGZ and HIMU
Explore further