Screener
AHLT vs CAOS
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF vs Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF
Key differences
AHLT is a fixed income ETF, while CAOS is an alternative ETF. AHLT charges 0.96% a year and CAOS 0.63%.
- AHLT is a fixed income fund, while CAOS is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AHLT follows a systematic alpha strategy; CAOS uses volatility strategy.
- CAOS costs 0.33% less per year.
- CAOS is much larger than AHLT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CAOS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AHLT | CAOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $669M |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | volatility strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +1.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.43% | 1.53% |
| Max drawdown | -20.18% | -3.60% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.