Screener
Explore the full screener
AHLT vs QRMI
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
Key differences
AHLT is a fixed income ETF, while QRMI is an alternative ETF. AHLT charges 0.96% a year and QRMI 0.60%.
- AHLT is a fixed income fund, while QRMI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- AHLT follows a systematic alpha strategy; QRMI uses option income.
- QRMI costs 0.36% less per year.
- AHLT is much larger than QRMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| AHLT | QRMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $16M |
| Since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 12.22% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.5% | +9.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.43% | 6.00% |
| Max drawdown | -20.18% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.