Screener
AIA vs GMF
iShares Asia 50 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Key differences
Both AIA and GMF are equity ETFs. AIA charges 0.50% a year and GMF 0.49%. The main difference: AIA covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- AIA covers the Asia-Pacific region; GMF covers emerging markets.
- AIA is much larger than GMF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AIA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5.1B | $406M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.09% | 1.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +75.9% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.4% | +4.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.25% | 17.01% |
| Max drawdown | -54.64% | -40.18% |
Similar to AIA and GMF
Explore further