Screener
AIEQ vs HCOW
Amplify AI Powered Equity ETF vs Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- HCOW costs 0.10% less per year.
- AIEQ is significantly larger than HCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIEQ is classified as equity, while HCOW is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AIEQ follows a index tracking strategy; HCOW uses option income.
- AIEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIEQ | HCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $119M | $15M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.41% | 11.68% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +25.6% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.51% | 14.08% |
| Max drawdown | -38.97% | -24.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIEQ and HCOW
Explore further