Screener
AIFD vs BPAY
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF vs iShares FinTech Active ETF
Key differences
- BPAY costs 0.20% less per year.
- AIFD is significantly larger than BPAY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIFD is classified as equity, while BPAY is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- AIFD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIFD | BPAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $9M |
| Since | 2017 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.7% | -4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.01% | 25.59% |
| Max drawdown | -33.20% | -33.62% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIFD and BPAY
Explore further