Screener
AIFD vs DRGN
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- DRGN costs 0.36% less per year.
- AIFD is significantly larger than DRGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIFD covers global markets; DRGN covers emerging markets.
- AIFD follows a active selection strategy; DRGN uses index tracking.
- AIFD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIFD | DRGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $25M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.01% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.20% | -20.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIFD and DRGN
Explore further