Screener
AIFD vs THNQ
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- THNQ costs 0.07% less per year.
- THNQ is significantly larger than AIFD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIFD follows a active selection strategy; THNQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIFD | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $107M | $322M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +88.7% | +71.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.01% | 26.07% |
| Max drawdown | -33.20% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIFD and THNQ
Explore further