Screener
AIMS vs VTHR
Acuitas Small Cap Active ETF vs Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund ETF Shares
Key differences
- VTHR costs 0.69% less per year.
- VTHR is significantly larger than AIMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AIMS follows a active selection strategy; VTHR uses index tracking.
- VTHR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AIMS | VTHR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $5.8B |
| Since | 2026 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.43% |
| Max drawdown | -8.30% | -34.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AIMS and VTHR
Explore further